Posted on 11 January 2011.
MEETING CANCELLED: The meeting for this evening, Wednesday, January 12 has been cancelled due to the winter storm. The meeting has not yet been rescheduled.
CLARIFICATION: We have been asked to change the wording for the new sports field being proposed at Brodie Park South to “multi-purpose sports field” and not “football field.” We based our name for the sports field on the fact that the size of the field proposed is for a regulation sized football field, football goal posts and equipment are actually being left at the proposed location for the new sports field and the preliminary studies by Lenard Engineering are labelled “Football Field.” The proposal by Youth Sports, we learned after this article was published, is for an “Athletic Field”. The proposed sports field is being referred to variously as a “football field”, a “multi-purpose sports field”, and an “athletic field”. All three names refer to the same proposal to set aside 5 acres of the open field area at Brodie Park South for sports that is being presented to the members of the Brodie Park South Study Group Committee.
By: Maria Moore
Is the charge of the Brodie Park South Study Group Committee to draw up a master plan for the town-owned property or is it to give its blessing to the decision to locate a regulation sized football field on that property? Almost a year after Andy Riess of the Seniors Advisory Board approached the town’s selectmen for their approval to locate a new Senior Center at Brodie Park South which led to the convening of the Committee, the charge of that Committee is still unclear, even to its own members. Some members of the Study Group Committee believe their mandate is to draw up a master plan for Brodie Park South, while others consider the drawing up of a master plan for the property as secondary to getting the Committe members to agree to locate a football field on the property. With a meeting of the Brodie Park South Study Group Committee scheduled for Wednesday evening during which the public will be allowed to give input, we give below a status report on the Committee’s work to date.
Initial Progress: Public Input Received, Eco Baseline Study of Brodie Park South Submitted

Pine trees cut back and football equipment scattered around at Brodie Park South
We have not reported on any of the Brodie Park South Study Group Committee (the Committee – see the note at the foot of this article to see the groups represented on this Committee) meetings since May 17, 2010 when we reported on the public forum held by that committee to collect residents’ ideas of future uses for the town-owned property known as Brodie Park South. At that time, residents were told that their input was being sought to help the Committee develop a long-term plan for the use of the park; see our May 17, 2010 report The Future of Brodie Park South: Residents Give Their Input. Subsequently, we published the Brodie Park South Eco Baseline Study paid for by the Committee and undertaken by the Northwest Conservation District; see the original baseline study we published on May 20, 2010 and the updated copy of the baseline study we published on July 13, 2010 with Jean Cronauer’s email explaining the updates that had been made. Jean is the Executive Director of the Northwest Conservation District and a New Hartford resident.
The Committee’s Work Since July 2010
Since last July we have received anectodal updates of the Committee’s meetings. We have not been able to read official minutes of the meetings since none are being filed with the Town Clerk. Our sources informed us of the upcoming meeting scheduled for Wednesday, January 12, which will include an opportunity for public input, unlike prior meetings where the public has been allowed to attend but not to offer input. We asked Dan Eddy, the coordinator of the Committee to update us on the Committee’s work and in response we received a press release which we published on January 6.

Old tires and crates line the edge of a wooded area at Brodie Park South
According to the press release, the Committee members are being asked to set aside 5 acres – the field area – of Brodie Park South to accommodate a regulation sized football field. They are being asked to do this because, the press release says, the Rec Commission has “identified an urgent need to locate approximately 5 acres of land for an additional playing field”. There is no mention of a master plan having been agreed upon by the members of the Committee prior to being asked to set aside the field area for football.
As a former First Selectman of 30-some years ago said when he heard of the contents of the press release: “That’s putting the cart before the horse!” And that appears to be the opinion of the groups represented in the Committee other than Youth Sports and Rec. “I thought I was going to participate in drawing up a master plan for Brodie Park South, not to find a playing field for football.” One of the committee members told our reporter, adding that they had no expertise to contribute to a sports endeavor.
After almost a year of meetings the committee does not appear to be any closer to a master plan than they were at the beginning of the process. After soliciting and receiving residents’ input at the public forum in May of 2010 on how to best use the Brodie Park South property, and after receiving copies of the Eco Baseline Study for Brodie Park South which the Committee had commissioned from the Northwest Conservation District to help guide them towards a master plan, the Committee appears not to have made any progress towards a master plan.
Unclear Charge, Lack of Information Hamper Committee’s Work
The main underlying problem appears to be that the Committee has not been given a clear charge. Half the committee members believe that they are there to produce a master plan for the town-owned property, while the other half believes they are there to secure a permanent home for a football field. And the First Selectman? His input during the public input session in May of 2010 was that with 150 acres there’s enough land there for a piece for everybody. It is unclear how this fits in chronologically with the drawing up of a master plan.
Another underlying problem is the lack of information being made available to Committee members. Those members have asked for information regarding efforts to locate the football field elsewhere and also for locating it on Brodie Park South. Specifically, they have wanted to see cost benefit analysis that has been done for each of the alternate locations. This information has not been made available to them for any of the possible locations. This past Sunday, January 9 we published preliminary studies to locate a football field at the Antolini location and the Brodie Park North location. Those studies were carried out in 2008 at the request of then First Selectman Earl MacInnes and were paid for by the town. The studies are by the town’s consulting engineers, Lenard Engineering. Copies of the studies were obtained directly from the engineering company by one of the members of the Committee who has been asking for more information from the Committee without any information being made available. The Antolini and Brodie Park North preliminary studies have been released to the public over the last 4-5 days by the member of the committee who obtained them and we subsequently published them on NewHartfordPlus.
We checked in yesterday with Town Hall regarding the Antolini and Brodie Park North preliminary studies and Christine Hayward, the First Selectman’s Assistant said that she was unaware of the studies having being done by the MacInnes administration and she did not have copies of those studies. We checked in with Annie Witte, the Town Bookkeeper, to ask how much the town had paid for those 2008 studies and Annie has said it will take her a couple of days to come up with the information since those records are now in storage. We will publish additional information about those preliminary studies if and when it becomes available.
Where the Committee Now Stands
Without an agreed upon master plan for the property, more than half the committee members have voiced their reluctance to consider setting aside any part of the property for additional playing fields. Other ideas from residents for the use of the Brodie Park South property include locating a Senior Center there and continuing the current use of Brodie Park South for walking, hiking and cross-country skiing. It has also been suggested that the field area be used for community gardens, thus preserving that area as prime farmland as it has been identified in the Eco Baseline study. However, without a master plan many of the committee members are reluctant to consider any specific use for that property.
An “Urgent” Need For A Football Field?
It would be unfair to deprive the young people involved in the football program from being able to participate in their chosen sport. The Wolverines (New Hartford Football and Cheer) have been using Brown’s Corner for their Sunday games and, until recently, for their evening practices. It is being said that Brown’s Corner cannot accommodate football and that there is an urgent need to locate that sport elsewhere; however, no concrete evidence of this has been made available. In the past year, New Hartford has spent a great deal of money on Brown’s Corner to upgrade the sports complex and to enlarge the parking lot. Claims of there not being enough parking available appear to be premature; there is still a large amount of fill in the parking area and as that fill is removed, more parking spaces will become available. In the meantime, it has been suggested that better coordination of when games and practices are scheduled by the different sports at Brown’s Corner could help alleviate many of the problems now being reported. With the numbers of children in town decreasing – according to the enrollment numbers at New Hartford Public Schools – it is difficult to accept the anectodal “urgency” for the need for new playing fields without concrete evidence being made available.
On closer examination we may find that the urgent need for a regulation size football field may be a regional need for such a field. The Wolverines are a regional organization, with players drawn from Barkhamsted, Colebrook, Hartland, Norfolk and Winsted/Winchester; see the statement at the foot of that organization’s website which reads:
“NHYFC: TOWNS WE SERVE: New Hartford is proud to partner with the following communities to build our program’s strength and longevity. Barkhamsted, Colebrook, Hartland, Norfolk & Winsted/Winchester.”
These are precisely the same towns from which the players of the Gilbert/Northwestern Football team are drawn. The Wolverines are considered the feeder program for the Gilbert/Northwestern Football team and have been credited with providing a ready pool of talented players for the high school team.
A Taxpayer’s View From One Of The Six Towns Served By The Youth Football Program
As a taxpayer in New Hartford, one of the six towns served by the youth football program, it is difficult for our reporter to understand why only New Hartford is being asked to accommodate the need for a regional football field. It would be fairer for all six towns to be asked to participate in identifying an appropriate space for the football field and then to share in the cost of constructing and maintaining the field.
Such a regional effort would also provide an opportunity for Northwestern Regional #7 to have access to a football field in its own school district and potentially bring that sport home to our regional high school. Currently, the majority of the Gilbert/Northwestern players are from Regional # 7 and Gilbert recently increased dramatically the amount it charges Regional #7 for each of its players to participate in the Gilbert football program. At its September 1, 2010 meeting the Regional # 7 Board of Ed agreed to increase the amount paid to Gilbert for the Northwestern players to be able to continue playing football with Gilbert. The Board also agreed for Superintendent Palmer to schedule a meeting with Gilbert to discuss the future of the cooperative arrangement between the two schools; see the Gilbert Football discussion in the September 1 minutes of the Regional #7 Board of Ed, of which New Hartford First Selectman Dan Jerram is a member.
In our opinion, it would be premature at this time for the town to take on the responsibility and the expense of providing a football field for the youth sports football program without first thoroughly investigating a regionalized solution to this regional need.
Looking Towards The Committee’s Wednesday, January 12 Meeting
We hope that Wednesday evening’s meeting of the Brodie Park South Study Group Committee will address the concerns of some of its members and of the community at large as reported above. We also hope that the Committee’s leadership will take this opportunity to refocus on the original charge of the Committee: that of crafting a master plan for Brodie Park South that will take into consideration the property’s unique characteristics as well as the recreational needs of the community as a whole.
___________
The Brodie Park South Study Group Committee members represent the Conservation Commission, the Open Space Preservation Commission, the Friends of Brodie, Youth Sports and two members of the Rec Commission. The Seniors Advisory Board is no longer represented on the committee; their representative withdrew from the Committee because, as the members of the Advisory Board told our reporter: “We felt like we were spinning our wheels” after they were redirected from their proposal to build the new Senior Center at Brodie Park South and were asked to consider the Brodie House location, or even the Field House. “We’ve been that route before!” The Advisory Board members said, adding that this is the third administration that the seniors have approached for help in finding a permanent location for their senior center.
Disclosure: Our reporter is a member of the New Hartford Senior Center; she is part of the 23% of the New Hartford population (according to the 2000 Census) who are eligible for membership in the Senior Center, a large constituency of taxpayers who make few demands for town services.

Cross country skiers avoid the goal posts and used tires left behind by football in this communal recreation area at Brodie Park South

The images with this article were photographed at Brodie Park South this past Sunday and show football's presence at the town-owned property